After succeeding in defying the will of the American people, and passing an unconstitutional health care takeover, Obama challenged Republicans seeking repeal to “go for it:”
From the category archives:
Democrats
Organizational Dystrophy: NAACP Condemns Tea Party
Updated: NAACP Doubles Down on Twitter
When the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was founded in 1909, it had a legitimate purpose. Their original mission:
To promote equality of rights and to eradicate caste or race prejudice among the citizens of the United States; to advance the interest of colored citizens; to secure for them impartial suffrage; and to increase their opportunities for securing justice in the courts, education for the children, employment according to their ability and complete equality before law.
The change was slow, but ultimately, the organization and it’s like-minded counterparts succeeded. With the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act despite an attempted filibuster by the late Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, we as a nation began the final leg of this journey. Unfortunately for the NAACP, they now face the activist’s paradox. Since they have been so successful, their organization no longer has a purpose. Their stated mission has hardly changed, which means they must continue to find racism, change their mission, or dissolve.
{ View Comments }
Conviction Can’t Be Compelled
First, there was the “Coffee Party” flop. Now the liberals are trying once again to create their own Tea Party with “One Nation” a coalition of 170 liberal groups united behind Obama’s radical agenda. If imitation is the highest form of flattery, the Tea Party should be content with its obvious success. Success liberals will never be able to replicate. For the self-titled pioneers of grassroots activism, liberals don’t seem to know anything about it.
{ View Comments }
What if Justice Played by Al Gore’s Rules?
Al Gore’s marriage has recently dissolved. Allegedly, he sexually assaulted a masseuse, and there has been enough media attention—primarily ginned up by the infidelity experts at the National Enquirer—to warrant reopening the case. If justice played by Al Gore’s rules, then I’d recommend the nearest courtroom hand down a conviction as soon as possible, and put this debacle to rest.
After all, a consensus has emerged. The facts of the case are settled. We cannot second guess the expert testimony of the crime’s only witness. By Gore’s own logic, we must acknowledge the crime has occurred. All we can decide is his fate. What are the consequences for such a heinous act? How can we prevent similar crises in the future?
{ View Comments }
