Having failed so far to produce the sixty votes necessary to pass a potentially unconstitutional health “care” bill in the Senate, Senator Reid has proposed a new deadline. The liberal Democrat majority leader wants to attempt to force a vote on the Senate Bill on Christmas Eve. Reid has chosen this time for two reasons: first, it is about as late as he can go to still have a final bill on Obama’s desk before the State of the Union speech in January. Second, and most importantly, it is the one night ordinary Americans will be least likely to show up and protest the proceedings. Just like Queen Pelosi in the House, he will attempt to force this monstrosity onto the American people at the eleventh hour. Never-mind the bill will achieve none of its stated goals and will only exacerbate the current system’s problems; after decades of failure, the liberals will have finally obtained socialized heath care and destroyed a major sector of the United States economy.
From the monthly archives:
December 2009
Sen. Reid’s Plan to Cure Your Christmas Cheer
{ View Comments }
Download the CRU “Climategate” Emails
The “Climategate” emails are available for download from the following sources:
{ View Comments }
Why Obama Needs Health Care by Christmas
There is one major reason why Obama needs the diabolical health “care” scheme currently being considered in Congress to pass before the end of the year. ObamaCare is his signature issue. At this point, nearly a quarter of the way through his term, he has suffered an incredible drop in popularity and hemorrhaged enough points to grant himself a lower approval rating than Jimmy Carter at the equivalent point in the former President’s failed tenure. After almost an entire year, our President has no achievements. The so-called “mandate for change” hasn’t produced any results. Obama has done nothing to improve our economy, stalled for months on Afghanistan only to accept a very “Bush-esque” war plan, and failed miserably in his attempt to free the terrorists from “Club Gitmo.”
{ View Comments }
The Truth About the “Teabaggers”
Rachel Maddow and her liberal cohorts are right that “teabagging” had a preexisting, crude, sexual meaning before the term was ever applied to political protesters angered by excessive government. It is extremely annoying however, for liberal television hosts to continue pretending that the conservative protestors chose this moniker. At the original protests, there were many bags of tea, but very few–if any at all–references to “teabagging.” It wasn’t “funny when these members of this emerging far-right protest movement started calling them teabaggers and threatening to teabag anyone who disagrees with them” because that’s not what actually happened. As Alex Koppelman wrote for Salon.com in April 2009:
Truth be told, though, for the most part conservatives haven’t actually been using the words in such a way as to lend themselves to double entendre. With one or two exceptions, almost all of it has actually been coming from the left, which seems to have adopted the joke en masse during an earlier round of these protests back in February.
{ View Comments }
CSU Crime Rate In Pictures
A picture is worth a thousand words. In 2003, CSU changed it’s rules to allow students with Concealed Weapons Permits to carry concealed on campus. According to anti-gun groups like the Brady Campaign and IACLEA, the crime rates should have skyrocketed after the change.
{ View Comments }
